Posted on September 11, 2009 in Child Support

A common inquiry for Maryland divorce lawyers is how child support is calculated with questions such as, is it based on the custody arrangement, the amount of income of the parties, are the parent’s expenses taken into consideration, and what about expenses associated with the child? The answer, for the most part is all of the above, with the exception of the parent’s expenses, which are generally not taken into consideration unless it is an above the child support guidelines case. The Maryland legislature has enacted guidelines which provide a standard formula for calculating child support. The Maryland Code, Family Law § 12-204 provides that child support shall be calculated based on the parties combined adjusted actual income combined with the number of children the parties share. Not only do the guidelines take into account the parties’ gross income (not net income), but also any health insurance costs the parties are paying for the child or the children, costs of work-related child care either party may be paying for the child or the children, extraordinary medical expenses paid for the child or the children, and existing prior child support obligations.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on September 10, 2009 in Health Insurance Malpractice

The Washington Post has just published a fascinating article about health insurers who improperly cancel health insurance policies to save money once their insureds got sick. What a outrageous thing for an insurer to do. The article reports large verdicts against these health insurers, which are totally appropriate. With one such insurer, the employees actually received bonuses for cancelling such policies. What a disgrace. A copy of the article regarding can be found here. You will need to quickly register to view the article but it is worth it.

Over the years, I have successfully handled a number of breach of contract cases, which is really the main claim in such cases. In such a case, extensive pretrial discovery is necessary to get to the root of why these policies are cancelled. Having an understanding of medical issues also is very helpful.

Amazingly, some health insurers don’t seem to understand that people buy their policy to protect themselves form catastrophic medical bills and, after these people have paid premiums for years, they expect that the insurer will actually pay those bills if necessary. Amazing.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on September 08, 2009 in Surgery Malpractice

A widower has won an $8.5 million medical malpractice verdict against an Indiana hospital over his wife’s death. The woman, who had a dangerous bowel obstruction, died after the hospital failed to timely get an x-ray to doctors that showed her condition. During the trial, the man’s lawyers presented evidence demonstrating that the hospital failed to promptly get an x-ray to doctors that revealed the bowel obstruction, which is a life-threatening medical condition. The Plaintiff alleged that the hospital’s actions led to a one day delay in reading the film and postponed emergency surgery that would have cleared the obstruction and saved the woman’s life.

As an experienced Baltimore, Maryland medical malpractice lawyer, I have handled several bowel cases arising from negligence. Some have been mesenteric ischemia malpractice cases and others have been bowel obstruction malpractice cases. Time is of the essence in treating such a condition, and timely communication among the health care providers is essential. To see some of the cases I have handled, click here.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on September 04, 2009 in Motorcycle Accidents

Arthur deRoaldes Remanjon, a wedding photographer who also documented Fells Point and New Orleans, died Wednesday when the motorcycle he was driving struck a vehicle in the Tuscany- Canterbury section of North Baltimore. A recent article in the Baltimore Sun, documents the life and achievements of this well-known Baltimore resident and describes the tragic circumstances surrounding his death. Every year, hundreds of Maryland residents are injured or killed in motorcycle accidents around the state. Many of these accidents could have been avoided had the other drivers been paying proper attention and following the rules of the road. As experienced accident attorneys, we can help injured citizens and their families recover for accidents caused by negligent drivers. Our firm has secured numerous large verdicts and settlements on behalf of clients who have been injured by negligent drivers.

If you or someone you know is injured in an automobile or motorcycle accident, please feel free to contact Andrew G. Slutkin with further questions or inquiries at 410-385-2786.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on September 04, 2009 in Probable Cause

https://www.silvermanthompson.com/lawyer-attorney-1300822.htmlAs a Maryland DUI/DWI Attorney I have become very accustomed to analyzing a client’s performance on the standardized field sobriety tests (at least the police officer’s version of that performance) to determine its legal significance. There are two reasons why police officers request that people suspected of DUI or DWI request the suspect to the perform the standardized field sobriety tests which are the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test (HGN), the Walk and Turn and the One Leg Stand. There are certainly other tests that police officers asks suspect to perform in these situations such as alphabet, counting and finger dexterity tests but the three listed above are the standardized tests recommended by the NTSB.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on August 31, 2009 in Child Support

With the economic downturn, more and more clients are filing for modification of their child support obligation, in an attempt to decrease the amount they owe every month. In fact, according to the Associated Press The Maryland Child Support Enforcement Administration has seen an 18 percent increase over the last year in requests for child support modifications.

In accordance with Section 12-104 of the Family Law Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, “the court may modify a child support award subsequent to the filing of a motion for modification and upon a showing of a material change of circumstances.” Courts have held that an involuntary loss of employment is a material change in circumstances. However, it is up to the parent who is seeking to reduce their payment to file for a modification, and child support is not decreased until an order is in place (not simply because a Motion was filed). Many clients who are paying child support and suffer loss of a job, incarceration or a decrease in income do not file a motion to modify their child support with the court, because they may not be aware of this option or they wait to file and end up with a huge arrearage situation (past due child support). If child support is in fact modified, the Court may only make the new amount retroactive to the date of the filing, not back to the date of the loss of employment, incarceration or decreased income. If a modification of child support is the best course of action, it is important to move quickly to maximize the potential benefit.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on August 31, 2009 in Infection Malpractice

A Los Angeles jury has awarded $7.3 million in a medical negligence lawsuit against a hospital due to the alleged failure to timely diagnose and treat a baby with meningitis in a neonatal intensive care unit. The baby had suffered brain damage as a result of the malpractice.

As an experienced Baltimore, Maryland medical malpractice attorney, I have handled a number of failure to timely diagnose and treat infection cases. One critical issue in these cases is what lawyers call causation. The attorney for the plaintiff must be able to prove that had the diagnosis been timely made, that there was enough time to treat the infection. This requires expert testimony usually from an infectious disease specialist or medical examiner. To see some of the cases I have handled, click here .

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on August 28, 2009 in Domestic Violence

Maryland Criminal Attorneys are commonly called upon to represent defendants who are charged with domestic violence assaults. As I have noted in previous blogs on the subject of domestic violence, there was an explosion of new domestic violence arrests in this country after the OJ Simpson acquittal in 1994. Police officers were encouraged to aggressively enforce the law in domestic cases where they previously might have considered these cases family matters and not law enforcement matters.

Additionally special domestic violence police units and prosecution teams were created throughout the country and new laws were enacted to allow the police and prosecutor to more aggressively pursue perpetrators of domestic violence. For instance in Maryland, new laws were enacted to allow for the warrant-less arrest of those suspected of domestic assaults under certain circumstances – even when the defendant is only suspected of committing a misdemeanor. Unfortunately, some people have taken advantage of these new laws and the new tactics of the police and prosecutors to have others falsely arrested. I had just such a case in Baltimore County Circuit Court this week.

My client, who has no prior criminal record, found himself in a relationship with a young women with a prescription pill addiction. He was not immediately aware of the problem and, unfortunately for him, she became pregnant prior to his learning of her addiction. She had a baby boy and they continued an on-again off-again relationship for about a year after he was born. Right around the boys’ first birthday, my client decided that he wanted to end the relationship altogether and wanted custody of the child. The boys’ mother had already had one child taken from her by the Department of Social Services for child neglect. My client believed that because of this fact, he would have a relatively easy time gaining custody. He did not anticipate what would happen next.

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on August 28, 2009 in Emergency Room Malpractice

A retired naval officer has settled has case with a Naval Hospital in Florida for close to $1 million after claiming that the hospital negligently handled his medical treatment and caused doctors to remove part of his brain. The officer, now 42 is now permanently and totally disabled and unable to support his family. He settled his medical malpractice case for $625,000 in cash along with monthly payments of $1,600 for the rest of his life (an annuity valued at about $325,000). The settlement was approved this month after the officer filed a lawsuit against the Navy that was scheduled for a jury trial in September. The lawsuit stemmed from treatment the man received in March 2007, when he went to the naval hospital complaining of severe headaches. The Hospital initially diagnosed the man with viral meningitis and discharged him that month. He still was suffering severe headaches and went to a nearby civilian hospital where he was correctly diagnosed with viral encephalitis. The delayed diagnosis resulted in severe brain swelling and doctors subsequently had to remove parts of the man’s brain. Federal law prohibits people in the armed forces from suing the military, but the man’s case was able to be filed because he was retired at the time of the incident. A copy of the article regarding the case can be found here .

Continue Reading ››

 Posted on August 19, 2009 in Marital Property

With more and more Maryland couples coming to a marriage with substantial assets, those couples have property disposition issues at the time of divorce. For example, I am frequently asked what happens to the marital home that is titled as tenants by the entirety, but that one spouse contributed a substantial amount of non-marital money towards (for instance, one spouse sold a home that was acquired before the marriage and never lived in by the parties, and used those proceeds for part or all of the down payment on the marital home). Clients ask is this home then marital or non-marital, and can I get all of the non-marital money I back that I put into the home? The answer is it depends.

In accordance with Section 8-201 of the Family Law Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, “marital property includes any interest in real property held by the parties as tenants by the entirety unless the real property is excluded by valid agreement.” Therefore, even if non-martial funds are used to purchase the marital home, if it is titled as tenants by the entirety (T by E) both spouses are equal owners of the home and it is marital property. Under this scenario, Maryland case law precludes the court from employing a “source of funds” theory as it may with other types of marital property. However, the court may utilize Section 8-205 of the Family Law Article to “reimburse” a spouse by way of a monetary award. This is not an automatic refund to the contributing spouse and by current Maryland case law cannot be when non-marital funds are used to purchase a home titled as tenants by the entirety, but the court may use the monetary award to correct inequities in the way which martial property is titled.

Continue Reading ››