Trusted for Integrity.
Chosen for Results.
Recent Blog Posts
What is the legal age of consent in Maryland for engaging in sexual conduct?
This post has been updated to reflect the age of consent in Maryland for 2024.
“What is the age of sexual consent in Maryland” is a legal question that I am asked quite often. The general rule is that the age at which a young person can legally consent to engage in intercourse, sexual contact, or a sexual act with another person is 16 years. Please see Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law 3-301 for the extensive definitions of sexual contact and sexual act under the statute.
There is an exception to this rule if the older participant is less than four years older than the other. In other words, it may or may not be illegal for a 19-year-old to have sex with a 15-year-old or an 18-year-old to have sex with a 14-year-old, depending upon when the participants’ birthdays occur.
A violation of the statute occurs if the participants’ birthdays are four years or more apart.
Your Customer Filed for Bankruptcy: Now What?
Many business creditors know that their customers are in financial distress before a bankruptcy filing. In this post, we cover two major issues that creditors must be aware of when a business or individual, perhaps a customer, borrower, or supplier, files a petition for bankruptcy protection: (1) the automatic stay and (2) the proof of claim and its firm deadline.
In football, when the referee blows the whistle, all play must stop and there can be serious penalties for “late hits.” You can think of the automatic stay the same way. When a debtor files a voluntary petition to initiate a bankruptcy case in a U.S. Bankruptcy Court, an “automatic stay” goes into effect under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). In the legal arena, a “stay” means a pause, stop, or freeze. The courts take the automatic stay very seriously.
For example, Judge Michelle Harner of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland explains that “[t]he automatic stay is a core and critical component of the bankruptcy system.” In re Siegal, 591 B.R. 609, 621 (Bankr. D. Md. 2018). The automatic stay protects both debtors and creditors. It “provides the debtor with a breathing spell from the harassing actions of creditors, and it protects the interest of all creditors by preventing dismemberment of the debtor’s assets before the debtor can formulate a repayment plan or, in liquidation cases, the court can oversee equitable distribution of the debtor’s assets.” In re Schwartz-Tallard, 803 F.3d 1095, 1100 (9th Cir. 2015)). Therefore, “courts scrutinize, and take seriously, alleged violations of the automatic stay.” In re Siegal, 591 B.R. at 621. Note that the automatic stay is just that; it is automatic, which means it “operates without the necessity for judicial intervention” and it “remains in force until a federal court either disposes of the case or lifts the stay.” See In re Soares, 107 F.3d 969, 975 (1st Cir. 1997) (internal citations to the Bankruptcy Code omitted). This means that the debtor does not need to ask a judge to order an automatic stay.
Maryland Law of Autopsies
Many Marylanders, and even experienced personal injury lawyers, are unclear of the law and policies regarding autopsies in Maryland. Below are the most frequently asked questions surrounding autopsies in Maryland:
What is an autopsy?
An autopsy is a series of tests and examinations performed on the body and its internal organs to determine the presence of an injury and/or to identify any disease that may have caused or contributed to the death of a person where the cause is not apparent. Additionally, special tests are performed to check for the presence of infectious diseases, alcohol and/or drugs.
Why are autopsies performed?
In Maryland, a death certificate must be completed by a doctor for all deaths before the body can be sent to the funeral home. When the person has a family doctor and dies from natural causes, the doctor can complete the death certificate and an autopsy may be unnecessary. However, if the person is not under the care of a physician or the death appears to be unusual or suspicious in nature or State law requires it, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner must be notified to begin an investigation and determine the cause of death so that the death certificate can be completed. Similarly, in some situations, a hospital or State-licensed physician may, with the permission of the decedent’s family, perform an autopsy.
In What County or City Should Your Maryland Divorce Be Filed?
Divorce is a civil proceeding and therefore like all civil proceedings, the action shall be brought in the county or city where the Defendant (opposing spouse) resides, carries on a regular business, is employed, or habitually engages.
However, unlike other civil proceedings, a divorce proceeding may additionally be filed where the Plaintiff (spouse filing for the divorce) resides. In addition, civil actions regarding custody may be filed where the father, alleged father, mother or child resides. Maryland Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings, 6-202.
Although this may seem like a simple concept, filing in the wrong county/city, may subject your case to removal to another county upon a motion because of “inappropriate venue.” This may, and most likely will, cause a delay to your proceeding and will cause you to incur additional attorney fees. Additionally, you should keep in mind that if the grounds for divorce occur in Maryland, one of the parties must be a domiciliary of Maryland and if the grounds for divorce occur outside of Maryland, one of the parties must have resided in Maryland for at least one year prior to the filing of the action for divorce. Maryland Code, Family Law, 7-101.
Will a Foreign Divorce be Recognized as a Valid Divorce in the State of Maryland
Over the years, we have had many clients ask if a divorce that they obtained in foreign country will be recognized here in Maryland. The answer is yes, the divorce will be recognized in the United States, so long as the divorce was obtained by a Court that had authority to do so and the divorce was granted legally.
In the Maryland case of Wolff v. Wolff, 40 Md. App. 168 (1978), the Appellate Court of Maryland (then called the Court of Special Appeals) determined that an English divorce decree was recognized in Maryland based on comity. The principle of comity allows judgments of courts in foreign countries to be recognized in the United States.
In the Wolff case, the parties were divorced by an English court and Ms. Wolff was awarded alimony by the English divorce decree. A few years later, Ms. Wolff, who was still residing in London, filed a Complaint to Enforce Foreign Decree seeking to enforce the alimony provision of the English divorce decree in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, where Mr. Wolff resided. Mr. Wolff filed a preliminary objection, seeking to prevent the Maryland court from enforcing the English divorce decree by arguing that the Maryland court lacked jurisdiction. The circuit court agreed with Mr. Wolff and dismissed Ms. Wolff’s complaint. Ms. Wolff appealed, and the Appellate Court reversed the circuit’s court decision.
Annulment Instead of Divorce in Maryland
A common belief is that a spouse may obtain a quick annulment of a marriage versus an actual divorce if they have been married for less than six months. While that may be the case elsewhere, it is not the case in the State of Maryland.
In Maryland, an annulment can only be granted when a marriage is invalid because it is void or voidable; never due to the length of time, or lack thereof, that the parties resided together as husband and wife. The grounds for an annulment, making the marriage void or voidable, arise before the date of the actual marriage ceremony.
A void marriage is never valid, and a party cannot waive the grounds that make the marriage void because these grounds implicate public policy concerns. Not only can a party to the marriage file for an annulment of this marriage, but so can a third party.
A marriage is void if, at the time of the marriage ceremony:
- Either party was legally married to someone else; or
Latent Defect Discovery After Home Purchase
What if I purchase a home “as-is” and later discover latent defects that are significant and expensive to repair?
Buyers can submit to mediation through Maryland REALTORS® to recover damages associated with latent defects not disclosed at the time of sale.
In the State of Maryland, the standard Residential Contract of Sale form used by Maryland REALTORS® includes a provision that allows for mediation of disputes arising out of the sale and purchase of a residential property. Mediation is a process where parties attempt to resolve a dispute without, or before the filing of a lawsuit with the assistance of a neutral mediator. When a buyer of residential property discovers a latent defect after purchasing property and it is clear the seller knew about said defect and failed to disclose it to the buyer, mediation through Maryland REALTORS® can be an effective process to achieve a resolution. A copy of the Residential Contract of Sale form can be found here.
How Do I File a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit in Maryland?
Requirements for Filing a Malpractice Case in Maryland
As Maryland medical malpractice attorneys, we often are asked what the requirements are for filing a medical malpractice claim in Maryland. Pursuing a medical malpractice claim is a complex process that is governed by very specific laws and requirements. In Maryland, understanding those laws and requirements is crucial to the likelihood of success and compensation for victims of medical malpractice.
Step 1: Hire a Medical Malpractice Attorney
If you may have been a victim of medical malpractice, you should hire an attorney immediately to promptly investigate your potential claims. An investigation by an attorney will include obtaining and reviewing the medical records and hiring the required and appropriate expert to certify that your case has merit — all within enough time to ensure that the claims are filed well in advance of the statute of limitations. Because of the complexity of medical malpractice claims, you should not attempt to satisfy these legal requirements on your own.
Understanding Department of Social Services Investigations and How to Appeal Finding of Indicated, Unsubstantiated, or Ruled Out Child Abuse and/or Neglect
What is a DSS investigation?
The Code of Maryland Regulations (“COMAR”), Sec. 07.02.07.00, et seq. codifies the process by which the local Department of Social Services (“DSS”) is to investigate allegations of child abuse and/or neglect, as well as the subsequent findings that may be reached at the end of any investigation. Said findings may be contested directly to DSS and/or to the Office of Administrative Hearings.
What happens during a DSS investigation into child abuse and/or neglect?
Within 24 hours of receiving a report of suspected child abuse and/or neglect, the local DSS will initiate an on-site investigation of the reported location. During an investigation, the local DSS will first assess the immediate safety and risk of maltreatment of the alleged victim and of the children who are household or family members of the alleged victim or in the care/custody of the alleged maltreator.
Federal Court Grants Motion to Remand in Putative Class Action Against Johns Hopkins Involving Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law
On May 23, 2024, after nearly a year of motions practice, Judge George L. Russell III of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland granted plaintiff’s motion to remand its putative class action to state court. Serving as local counsel, Silverman Thompson filed the class action in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City on January 19, 2023. The plaintiff, who has been employed as an hourly, non-exempt worker at Johns Hopkins Hospital (“Johns Hopkins”) for over thirty years, contends that Johns Hopkins has a policy of rounding employees’ hours resulting in illegal withholding of wages, failure to pay minimum wage, and failure to pay overtime wages in violation of the Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law.
Johns Hopkins removed the matter to federal court more than seven months after receiving the complaint on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. Johns Hopkins argued that the United States District Court for the District of Maryland had jurisdiction pursuant to Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, which provides the court subject matter jurisdiction over employment disputes governed by collective bargaining agreements. Plaintiff promptly filed a motion to remand maintaining that Johns Hopkins’ removal was untimely – in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1446, Johns Hopkins had thirty days following receipt of the complaint to file a notice of dismissal.










